Glocalisation and multi-bi-lateralism

The debate on the future of globalisation as we know it is necessary. What will become of western governance? We report the reflection of Daniel Araya for Centre for International Governance Innovation.

The strategic research work of The Global Eye deals with this and tries to understand what will come out of the great recomposition of power relations taking place at planetary level.

We share the Araya’s perspective on the decline of the Western leadership. Equally, we share the objective fact that major countries around the world (China, India, Russia, Turkey, Iran, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Brazil) are working to strengthen their position as strategic regional players.

We believe that multilateralism, especially at this stage of deep radicalisation of national interests (excluding none), is a difficult prospect to achieve. Rather, we see the possibility of new regional approaches on a horizon that we call multi-bi-lateralism.

The responses to the consequences of the current de-generational megacrisis will be increasingly ‘variable geometry’ and will have to reckon with the regionalisation of international relations and with competition (which we hope will be ‘cooperative’ on the great issues affecting the survival of humanity and the planet) between macro-regions at the ‘glocal’ level.

Marco Emanuele
Marco Emanuele è appassionato di cultura della complessità, cultura della tecnologia e relazioni internazionali. Approfondisce il pensiero di Hannah Arendt, Edgar Morin, Raimon Panikkar. Marco ha insegnato Evoluzione della Democrazia e Totalitarismi, è l’editor di The Global Eye e scrive per The Science of Where Magazine. Marco Emanuele is passionate about complexity culture, technology culture and international relations. He delves into the thought of Hannah Arendt, Edgar Morin, Raimon Panikkar. He has taught Evolution of Democracy and Totalitarianisms. Marco is editor of The Global Eye and writes for The Science of Where Magazine.

Latest articles

Related articles