(China/Pandemic) Chinese academic: Why China’s ‘harsh’ counter-pandemic measures are valid (ThinkChina)

February 17, 2021

Putting ideology and biases aside, there was no unlawful coercion in China’s Covid-19 measures and no ethical redlines were breached, says Deng Xize. Based on contract theory, people give up some of their rights in exchange for benefits. It is thus expected that people would accept strict measures under the threat of the pandemic. In fact, most of the Chinese population adhered to the measures, with some going overboard in certain cases.

https://www.thinkchina.sg/chinese-academic-why-chinas-harsh-counter-pandemic-measures-are-valid?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly_newsletter

Marco Emanuele

Marco Emanuele è appassionato di cultura della complessità, cultura della tecnologia e relazioni internazionali. Approfondisce il pensiero di Hannah Arendt, Edgar Morin, Raimon Panikkar. Marco ha insegnato Evoluzione della Democrazia e Totalitarismi, è l’editor di The Global Eye e scrive per The Science of Where Magazine. Marco Emanuele is passionate about complexity culture, technology culture and international relations. He delves into the thought of Hannah Arendt, Edgar Morin, Raimon Panikkar. He has taught Evolution of Democracy and Totalitarianisms. Marco is editor of The Global Eye and writes for The Science of Where Magazine.

(China/Pandemic) Chinese academic: Why China’s ‘harsh’ counter-pandemic measures are valid (ThinkChina)

Geostrategic magazine (21 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (20 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (16 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (15 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (14 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (13 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (12 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (9 November 2024)

Geostrategic magazine (8 November 2024)