(Adil Ahmad Haque – Just Security) Israel and the United States began major military operations against Iran on Feb. 28. In response, Hezbollah began launching drones, rockets, and missiles into Israel on March 2. Israel responded in turn with a large-scale air and ground campaign into Lebanon that has killed hundreds of people, including dozens of children, several medics, and at least one priest, while displacing hundreds of thousands of civilians from their homes. The European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy says that “Israel has the right to self-defence in line with international law” but that “Israel’s response has been heavy-handed,” causing “mass displacement,” and risking “severe humanitarian consequences.” She concludes that “Israel should cease its operations in Lebanon.” This statement suggests that Israel’s response exceeds the limits of proportionality internal to the right of self-defense because of the cumulative harm it is inflicting on civilians. This article argues that Israel’s response exceeds the limits of necessity internal to the right of self-defense because Israel has a reasonable alternative. The requirements of proportionality and necessity are complementary, and Israel’s military campaign in Lebanon appears to exceed both. – The CAH Treaty Advances with First Preparatory Committee
The Crimes Against Humanity Treaty Advances with First Preparatory Committee
Related articles



