Antisemitism – Contemporary Antisemitism in the Political Discourse of Five Western European Countries: Germany, France, Britain, Spain, Ireland (Shahar Eilam, Adi Kantor, Tom Eshed, Tal-Or Cohen, INSS)

This report, produced by the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), in collaboration with the Jewish Agency for Israel, examines and analyzes the phenomenon of contemporary antisemitism in the political discourse of five major Western European countries—Germany, France, Britain, Spain, and Ireland. The research is based on systematic mapping of public expressions of antisemitism by elected officials, over a period of one year, from late 2019 until late 2020.

The findings indicate that some politicians in Western Europe—on both the right and the left—deliberately and maliciously use antisemitic ideas and expressions for political gains. This can be seen in the context of the increasing strength of extremist and populist parties on both sides of the political spectrum, which have contaminated the political and public discourse with antisemitic statements and attitudes.

Indeed, the present analysis indicates that the scale is tipping toward those who espouse antisemitism and away from those who try to moderate it, particularly given the process of sociopolitical radicalization, growing polarization, and the rise of once marginalized extremists at the expense of the moderate center. These processes have been accelerated by social media, which has been exploited to spread hateful content almost without any significant limits, at least for the time being.

All this has contributed to antisemitism’s increasingly becoming part of the political mainstream; the politicization of antisemitism as a means for political rivals to attack one another; and the appearance of cracks in the broad consensus both to preserve the memory of the Holocaust and fight against antisemitism. These cracks are manifested primarily by distorting and rewriting history mainly on the right and by anti-Israel discourse on the left.

Although it has unique characteristics, antisemitism must not be perceived as a local and domestic challenge for Jewish communities alone but rather as manifesting a much wider phenomenon of hate speech, hateful discourse, and sometimes even violence. The increasing politicization of antisemitism demonstrates the magnitude and influence that its destructive consequences have for the entire society, Jews and non-Jews alike, and therefore it needs to be recognized as a global concern.

Table of Contents:

Amos YadlinIsaac Herzog
76 years have passed since the end of World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust in Europe. Despite the ongoing commitment of most European leaders to preserve the memory of the Holocaust and to fight antisemitism, we have experienced a rise in antisemitism recently in a number of locations in Europe. Once again, Jews in certain cities and neighborhoods are feeling insecure and increasingly threatened as individuals and as communities.

This report examines and analyzes the phenomenon of antisemitism in the political discourse of five major Western European countries—Germany, France, Britain, Spain, and Ireland. It is the final report of a research project implemented during the second half of 2020 by a team of researchers at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), in collaboration with the Jewish Agency. In this regards, it is important to note that this study was finalized prior to the security escalation between Israel and Hamas in May 2021 and the surge of antisemitic events that followed it.

This research addresses existing antisemitism in the political discourse in five Western European countries: Germany, France, Britain, Spain, and Ireland. Most of these Western European countries, some of which are home to the largest and most historic Jewish communities of Europe, have a legal and official record of being committed to fighting antisemitism. However, too often the elected officials and official representatives of these states—who are supposed to uphold and reflect the commitments of the countries they represent and serve—fall short of the state’s commitment to combat Jew-hatred and at times even perpetuate it.

In the year 2020, 75 years after the gates of Auschwitz were finally opened, and the world stood still in shock at the sights and scale of horror and death of the German so-called “Final Solution of the Jewish Question,” Jew-hatred seems to be again dangerously rising in Germany. In his speech given on the occasion of the Fifth World Holocaust Forum on January 23, 2020 in Jerusalem, German president Walter Steinmeier referred to this disturbing development

On July 16, 1995, in a historical speech at the memorial for the Jewish victims of the Vél d’Hiv roundup of 1942 in Paris,14 President Jacques Chirac confessed the role of France in the tragic fate of its Jewish population during the German occupation and for deporting thousands of Jews to the death camps. After decades in which French leaders firmly refused to admit that French authorities had taken part in the systematic persecution, it took one brave leader standing in front of a small crowd of Jewish leaders and survivors of the death camps to state the following, marking an important milestone in the French contemporary memory discourse

During the last decade, and for the first time since the Holocaust and the end of World War II, antisemitism has become a central issue in the political and public discourse in Britain. It is one of the most controversial issues witnessed in Britain’s political arena in recent years. The parliamentary elections in 2019 exposed the severity of the problem, although members of Parliament, particularly Jeremy Corbyn, the former leader of the Labour Party, made antisemitic statements before the 2019 elections. The gravity of the accusations of antisemitism and the many scandals that emerged from the Labour Party from 2015 to 2020 led to the dismal outcome in which many of Britain’s Jews abandoned the party after having been its most loyal supporters for decades; for them, the Labour Party had been their political home. According to Gillian Merron, the head of the Board of Deputies of British Jews and former minister on behalf of the Labour Party, “anti-Semitism in Britain is already not a hidden problem but one that visible and on center stage. Surprisingly, it is at the heart of our politics”.

Antisemitism in modern-day Spain has never been an organized political phenomenon; rather it is a manifestation of persistent anti-Jewish stereotypes in Spain’s society and culture, based on religious and mainly Catholic foundations. The de facto absence of Jews in Spain from the 15th to the 19th centuries, however, means that antisemitism in the country cannot be explained simply by the conflict between the Christian majority and the Jewish minority. Therefore, the phenomenon in Spain should be explained in the context of “antisemitism without Jews.” According to the scholar Anna Menny, antisemitism in Spain is not generally directed against the country’s Jewish community but rather against the image of the Jew as representing the “stranger” or the “immigrant”.

The history of modern Ireland is characterized primarily by the period of British colonialist rule, which continued for several hundred years until the creation of an independent Ireland in 1919. This period of gaining independence from British rule is still an important factor in shaping the Irish national narrative. Currently, large segments of the Irish public are opposed to to colonialism all over the world, thus explaining the widespread Irish support for the Palestinian claims in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The vocal criticism of Israel’s policies sometimes has deteriorated into demonstrations of hostility toward Israel and even antisemitic stereotypes.

The goal of this research was to examine and analyze contemporary manifestations of antisemitism, in the political discourse of five major European countries—Germany, France, Spain, Britain, and Ireland—over the course of one year, from June 2019 through September 2020. The basic assumption underlying this research was that the public and the political arenas mutually feed upon one another, such that the political discourse expresses the attitudes of the public to a large extent and influences the social processes and attitudes within the context of the public discourse and therefore also on today’s antisemitism. The main research questions asked were: How common was antisemitism in the political discourse among elected officials in these countries during the given time frame? How did antisemitism characterize the political discourse? How did the uniqueness of each country affect this context? Were there similarities between the countries in the way that antisemitism characterized their political discourse? In addition, the research emphasized the way the Jewish community in each country experienced and handled antisemitism.
Marco Emanuele
Marco Emanuele è appassionato di cultura della complessità, cultura della tecnologia e relazioni internazionali. Approfondisce il pensiero di Hannah Arendt, Edgar Morin, Raimon Panikkar. Marco ha insegnato Evoluzione della Democrazia e Totalitarismi, è l’editor di The Global Eye e scrive per The Science of Where Magazine. Marco Emanuele is passionate about complexity culture, technology culture and international relations. He delves into the thought of Hannah Arendt, Edgar Morin, Raimon Panikkar. He has taught Evolution of Democracy and Totalitarianisms. Marco is editor of The Global Eye and writes for The Science of Where Magazine.

Latest articles

Related articles